![]() in this Raw, I also found further examples in pictures with skintones: Filebin | wsurj65abh0bpt98 Unfortunately, there seems to be a posterization issue with the Velvia which seems to be caused by the “S” part of the HSV equalizer, probably the sharp jump in the red section. Thanks, that’s awesome! Both are amazingly close to the originals now. I guess the ideal way to get a perfect emulation would be via a custom DCP camera profile with DCamProf, but without a GUI it would be very, very time consuming, to say the least… ![]() When I’m finished with the adjustments I will post my first try of a Velvia emulation, so stay tuned ). The changes required seem too drastic and due to the limited control points would probably mess up the color rendering (harsh transitions, weird in-between colors…). the DCP created from DCamProf for the X100T seem to have a completely different idea how to render the lightness of blues. Maybe the only solution would be to ignore the “V” part and accept that the lightness of colors will be different? Fuji vs. Also some “S” saturation values of the patches seem to have changed after the pretty heavy “V” adjustments. But if I adjust the L* curve, the V values will again be wrong. What is more, the V curve also changed the lightness and contrast distribution, so the L* curve from step 1 no longer matches. ![]() The problem is that even with V curve set to max some (especially the blue) patches are still too dark. The L* contrast curve part with the grey patches was easy, H and S equalizer also worked as expected, it was just when I came to the last part “V” that things started to fall apart. I am in the process of trying this workflow with a Colorchecker Passport shot with my X100T to create an emulation of Velvia, but ran into some problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |